For more blogs written by me go to www.myspace.com/mamitooflyy

The sex blog

Shawty was on the radio a little while ago CLAIMING that she abstained from sex until marriage. She outlined the whole relationship and how wonderful it was. The story took a nose dive for the worst though when she started to describe their sex life.  Said VIRGIN claims that the sex was wack and that she feels cheated. Now, I've heard people say it was too quick before (i.e.; 2 minute brotha) but never a virgin critique the technique.

Now lemme just go here with it, isn't the whole point to waiting until marriage and sticking with that one person about? Isn't that supposed to be all that you know? I mean really, if you haven't been watching porno and you haven't had sexual contact before then how can you know what you are missing as far as act wise? Sure, I know that you can tell when the romance isn't there but that wasn't the complaint because she clearly outlined that part in the scenario. I dunno. I can't say that she's lying but ehhh....whatever. Women have this convenient little way of catching amnesia when things don't pan out the way they want them too. A woman will be quick to say what doesn't count him because she didn't do so and so or x, y, z! LMAO

So with all that being said do you think that it is a GOOD thing to test out the waters and figure out what you want from a mate sexual? And then if you agree, then are you saying it's okay to go against EVERYTHING that the bible stands for on that issue.  Fornicating? WRONG! Kids out of wedlock? WRONG! Adultery?  WRONG!WRONG! WRONG! Although these are all consequences of testing the waters.

Input anyone ? LOL